Summary
Previous research has shown that people labeled with drug addiction are viewed as more blameworthy and dangerous compared to individuals labeled with mental illness who, in turn, are viewed more harshly than those with physical disabilities. Endorsement of such stereotypes often lead to less helping behavior and more avoidance of people with drug addiction compared to those with mental illness. In this study, attribution and dangerousness models are tested on a stratified random sample of the US population. The sample was recruited from a national online research panel (N = 815). Research participants read a vignette about a person with one of the three health conditions (mental illness, drug addiction, or physically handicapped in a wheelchair) and were asked to complete items representing attribution and dangerousness judgments about the person.
Findings
Results are consistent with our hypotheses. Addicted to drugs was seen as more blameworthy and dangerous compared to mental illness.
Applications
These findings are important for framing the stigma and stereotypes of mental illness and drug addiction are discussed. In turn, these kinds of basic models will inform stigma change efforts of advocates.
Citation
Corrigan, Patrick W., Sachiko. A . Kuwabara, and John O’Shaughnessy. ‘The Public Stigma of Mental Illness and Drug Addiction: Findings from a Stratified Random Sample’ (9 Journal of Social Work, 139.) 2009